Create argument maps for working through positions or transcribing a debate found elsewhere.
Permissions allow granting or revoking access to other users.
Suggestions allow others to contribute while still giving editors the final say.
Argument maps can be used as context for competitive games.
Competitive Play
A skill (elo) rating helps match players.
A reputation score based on opponent and community feedback affects skill rating and creates an incentive for players to argue in good faith.
Find opponents for any imaginable claim through a searchable lobby, or invite your friends to play directly.
Play at any pace, from a frenetic 10 minutes, to a more deliberate game where players have time to do in-depth research.
Don't sit and wait for your opponent to finish what they're saying. A tree-based response system allows players to work on different parts of the argument at the same time.
Someone is likely to win even if the argument isn't completely resolved. Points are awarded and lost based on contested subarguments.
Players are forced to engage with each other. The Focus action requires your opponent to respond to the claims you think are important.
Responses must meet basic criteria. A code of debate conduct is provided, and violating it lowers a player's reputation, which in turn affects their skill rating.